ETFs and Wash-Sale: The Tax Loophole (2024)

Exchange-traded funds (ETFs)are giving mutual funds a run for investors' money because ETFs get around the tax hit that investors in mutual funds encounter. Mutual fund investors pay capital gains taxon assets sold by their funds. ETFs​, however, don't subject investors to the same tax policies. ETF providersoffer shares"in kind," with authorized participants abuffer between investors and theproviders' trading-triggered tax events.

Key Takeaways

  • ETFs allow investors to circumvent a tax rule found among mutual fund transactions related to capital gains.
  • ETFs are structured in a way that avoids taxable events for ETF shareholders.
  • ETFs can avoid the wash sale rule because ETFs typically are an index for a sector or a group of stocks and are not "substantially identical" to a single stock.

The Wash-Sale Rule

Investors who buy a "substantially identical security"within 30 days before or after selling at a loss are subject to the wash-sale rule. The rule prevents an investor from selling a security at a loss, booking that loss to offset the tax bill, and then immediately buying the security back at, or near, the sale price.

ETF investors enjoy an advantage that worries Harold Bradley, once Kauffman Foundation's chief investment officer from 2007 to 2012. "It's an open secret," he told Investopedia. "High net worth money managers now are paying no taxes on investment gains. Zero."Bradley says that ETFs are used to avoid the IRS' wash-sale rule.

Enforcing IRS Rules

According to Bradley, the wash-sale rule is not enforced forETFs. "How many sponsors are there of an ETF?" he asks. Most indices have threeETFsto track them—ignoring leveraged, short, and currency-hedged variations—each provided by adifferent firm.

That makes itpossible to sell, for example,the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at a 10% loss, deduct that loss and buy theiShares S&P 500 ETF (IVV) immediatelywith the underlying index at the same level. "You basically can take a loss, establish it, and not lose your market position."

Michael Kitces, the author of the Nerd's Eye View blog on financial planning, told Investopedia by email that "anyone who (knowingly or not) violates those rules remains exposed to the IRS," but "there's no tracking to know how widespread it is."

Kitces points out that, from the IRS' perspective, a "widespread illegal tax loophole" translates to a "giant target for raising revenue." An IRS spokesperson told Investopediaby phone that the agency does not comment on the legality of specific tax strategies through the press.

Bradley is not so sure, though. "High net worth people don't have any interest in having the government understand" the loophole, which he thinks is"the biggest driver of ETF adoption by financial planners. Period. They can justify their fees based on their 'tax harvesting strategies.'"

Total ETF Assets

The Growth of ETFs

If Bradley is right, the implications of this practice go beyondtax-dodging by the wealthy. So much capital has flowed into index-tracking ETFs, he says, that markets "are massively broken right now." Money has poured out of individual stocks and into ETFs, leading to "massive" valuation distortions,

Bradley argues:"The meteoric rise in Low Volatility ETFs(150% annual asset growth since 2009) as a key driver of the 200%+ surge in relative valuations of low beta stocks to never-before-seen premia." The problem is not limited tolow-beta stocks, Bradley says. "People have never paid more for a penny of dividends. People have never paid more for earnings, people have never paid more for sales. And all of this is a function of people believing that someone else is doing active research."

Bradley is not optimistic. "You are undermining the essential price discovery feature that has been built into stocks over time that says, this is a good entrepreneur who's really smart, and he needs money to grow and build his company. That's been lost as a primary driver of the capital markets."

U.S.-listed ETFs andexchange-traded notes (ETNs)ballooned from about $102 billion in 2002 to $6.44 trillion in 2022. Total net assets for mutual funds in 2022 were approximately $22.1 trillion.

What Is a Tax Loss Harvesting Strategy?

Tax loss harvesting is a tax strategy that involves selling an asset with a capital loss to lower or eliminate the capital gain realized by other investments for income tax purposes.

Why Can ETFs Avoid the Wash-Sale Rule?

ETFs can avoid the wash sale rule because ETFs typically are an index for a sector or a group of stocks and are not "substantially identical" to a single stock.

When Are Two Investments Considered "Substantially Identical"?

The term "substantially identical security" pertains to tax rules published by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) regarding wash sales. Substantially identical securities are not different enough to be separate investments. Securities usually fall into this category if the market and conversion prices are the same and cannot be counted in tax swaps or other tax-loss harvesting strategies.

The Bottom Line

Exchange-traded funds are structured in a way that avoids the wash sale rule because the investments are typically tied to an index for a group of stocks and are not "substantially identical" to a single stock. As of 2022, investors held over $6 trillion in ETFs.

ETFs and Wash-Sale: The Tax Loophole (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Edwin Metz

Last Updated:

Views: 6193

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (58 voted)

Reviews: 81% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Edwin Metz

Birthday: 1997-04-16

Address: 51593 Leanne Light, Kuphalmouth, DE 50012-5183

Phone: +639107620957

Job: Corporate Banking Technician

Hobby: Reading, scrapbook, role-playing games, Fishing, Fishing, Scuba diving, Beekeeping

Introduction: My name is Edwin Metz, I am a fair, energetic, helpful, brave, outstanding, nice, helpful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.